This text is an on-site model of our Britain after Brexit e-newsletter. Enroll here to get the e-newsletter despatched straight to your inbox each week
Good afternoon. There will probably be an fascinating second in Brexitland at this time when the London mayor Sadiq Khan makes a speech on the Mansion Home warning that politicians need to stop “dodging or ducking” the Brexit issue as a result of it’s “dragging our financial system down”.
Attention-grabbing as a result of, not less than tonally, Khan’s plea to confront Brexit’s detrimental impacts head on contrasts with Sir Keir Starmer’s reasonably extra diffident “let’s make Brexit work” strategy, a phrase which itself belies an absence of ambition.
This can be a signal of the inherent rigidity between Starmer’s progress narrative and his plans to handle Brexit’s affect, that are inherently restricted by pink traces ruling out EU single market and customs union membership.
The e book I wrote final 12 months is actually a take a look at what’s left over, however electing to not discuss Brexit (since you’re both embarrassed about it, or don’t have bold options to handle its downsides) doesn’t imply that Brexit goes away.
Quite the opposite, it continues to inflict a drag on the UK financial system that — in keeping with modelling by consultancy Cambridge Econometrics commissioned by Khan — will go away the UK financial output 10 per cent smaller than it in any other case would have been by 2035.
As we mentioned final week, there are indicators that Labour, just like the Tories, are minded to focus on fixing issues at house reasonably than investing political capital on an unsure and troublesome negotiation with Brussels, which brings me to at this time’s fundamental subject: freeports.
This week Michael Gove and the funding minister Lord Dominic Johnson gave evidence to the Enterprise and Commerce choose committee on the progress of an idea that was talismanic for a lot of Brexiters, not least Rishi Sunak.
It adopted the publication of a delivery road map for freeports final December that, as one enterprise chief instructed me, was written within the tone that it “retains taking lots of time for this stuff to occur”.
Performative elements of freeports
What was fascinating within the Gove and Johnson look was the implicit acceptance of the performative elements of freeports that the Workplace for Price range Accountability had mentioned would have such a small financial affect it will be not possible to measure.
As data analysis by Sussex college’s UK Commerce Coverage Observatory has shown, UK freeports don’t have the basic benefits of “obligation inversion”, the place producers get to import inputs tariff-free and solely pay a tariff on completed items on the level of export.
That’s as a result of, as Peter Holmes of the UKTPO identified to the identical committee some time again, the UK world tariff doesn’t create these tariff “wedge” alternatives, even supposing the federal government’s consultation on freeports described them as a “key profit”.
Not any extra, it appears. This isn’t to be churlish, however to level out that freeports are literally — to cite Gove in his highway map — automobiles for “rebalancing regional economies” or put one other method, they’re a “levelling up” system.
Which means utilizing freeports, which now share most of the tax breaks handed to allied Funding Zones, to draw funding and create hubs in key sectors comparable to renewables — uncommon earths at Humber Freeport, for instance, or wind generators at Teesside.
‘Glorified bonded warehouses’
Johnson, who will get rep from enterprise teams as an brisk salesman of UK plc, urged the committee not to think about freeports any extra as “glorified bonded warehouses”, including that it was “essential to not over-analyse” an idea that he described as extra akin to a branding train.
(On the purpose of over-analysing, Gove was sometimes foggy about the place the federal government had bought its 200,000 freeport jobs prediction from, or how lengthy it will take for these jobs to materialise. We nonetheless await readability on that.)
However Johnson’s level was to not get slowed down within the element, however to embrace the massive image provide to traders. Levelling up, he mentioned, was an idea that was recognised around the globe and freeports had been “enormously highly effective as a hook” to assist him promote the UK internationally.
This dovetails with Lord Richard Harrington’s review into bettering the UK provide to worldwide traders through the use of freeports to enhance the “place-based, sector-specific provides throughout the UK” as different international locations, comparable to France and Sweden, already do.
Briefly, freeports are a regional industrial technique that dare not communicate its identify, and may very well be used because the spur for brand new clusters and funding, though how a lot of this exercise is “extra” will all the time be troublesome to find out as this very good Institute for Fiscal Studies report explains.
Will freeports work?
The larger query is whether or not this technique — when seen within the context of the detrimental Brexit impacts famous above and the mega-subsidies being dished out by the US and EU — goes to ship the sort of progress that each Labour and the Conservatives are promising.
The Treasury extended the freeport tax breaks from 5 to 10 years on the Autumn Assertion which was a recognition that the initiatives take a very long time to determine, and in addition introduced a brand new £150mn fund to help freeports get up and running.
Gove described the fund as a “beneficiant monetary package deal”, however in fact, as David Phillips, who co-authored the IFS report talked about above factors out, it’s “fairly small beer, even for what the OBR expects to be a fairly small coverage”.
Or because the Scottish Nationwide social gathering MP Douglas Chapman contended, whereas Gove talked in regards to the UK authorities “irrigating the soil” to draw funding, the federal government was “utilizing a teacup as a substitute of a power-hose”.
Finally, freeports are right here to remain. They’re just one piece of the puzzle, however the authorities is getting behind them not simply with cash, but in addition a dedication to place them entrance and centre of its inward funding provide, in addition to expediting planning, grid connections, easing planning consents and the like.
However for all Gove’s admirable salesmanship, they’re not a magic bullet and should be seen within the wider context of an financial system that — per Cambridge Econometric evaluation above — is already £140bn smaller than it will in any other case have been.
Brexit in numbers
At this time’s chart relies on a piece of work by Boston Consulting Group that predicts that shifts in world commerce flows in the direction of extra regional provide chains will lead to UK items commerce with each the US and EU truly declining over the subsequent decade.
Now fashions are solely fashions, however the assumptions within the BCG work mirror the anticipated shift in world commerce flows that may make the EU neighbourhood much more essential to the UK simply as we’ve chosen to erect limitations to commerce with that space.
This regionalisation development seems to be mirrored within the newest world commerce tracker from the UK in a Changing Europe, which finds that commerce within the third quarter of final 12 months with the EU amounted to 53.3 per cent of complete UK commerce, considerably up on pre-Brexit ranges.
Because the writer Stephen Hunsaker factors out, that isn’t due to booming EU-UK commerce, however as a result of the UK is struggling to deepen commerce ties with the remainder of the world. As he places it: “As but, the UK has been unable to defy gravity — the well-established incontrovertible fact that commerce along with your neighbours is simpler than commerce with the opposite facet of the world.”
Tim Figures, a former enterprise secretary adviser who’s now senior professional on geopolitics and commerce at BCG, says the “ongoing sluggish decline” of UK items commerce within the BCG forecast displays the anticipated onward march of “nearshoring” as geopolitical forces (US-China decoupling, the EU seek for strategic autonomy, for instance) more and more localises world commerce flows.
The additional problem for the UK (which has a resilient companies sector), provides Figures, is that trendy items more and more come bundled with companies — like linked automobiles — which is able to weigh on UK commerce.
Quite pointedly, given Khan’s warning above, Figures additionally notes that the BCG forecast relies on the belief that given the present political atmosphere “there will probably be little scope over the subsequent decade to enhance the UK-EU relationship in a method which makes a cloth distinction to the numbers.”
That’s the problem for Starmer if he wins. We’ll see.
Britain after Brexit is edited by Gordon Smith. Premium subscribers can sign up here to have it delivered straight to their inbox each Thursday afternoon. Or you possibly can take out a Premium subscription here. Learn earlier editions of the e-newsletter here.