It’s, as Elon Musk says, as if AOC is simply not that good.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the socialist Consultant from New York, had herself a day on the Biden impeachment inquiry hearings yesterday.
First, she questioned every of the three Republican witnesses as to whether or not they had “first-hand witness” testimony exhibiting proof of impeachable offenses by the President.
And, after all, barring their really being readily available when Biden is handed a bag of cash with an enormous greenback signal on the entrance of it, then no, the testimony or proof received’t be firsthand. We’re skeptical of the concept Ocasio-Cortez even is aware of what firsthand means.
Then she took to the X social media platform to say Republicans offered “zero proof to question President Biden.”
Republicans have zero proof to question President Biden. pic.twitter.com/GcA92T7JSl
— Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@RepAOC) September 28, 2023
No Proof To Impeach Biden? Come On, Man!
Now, you simply know Ocasio-Cortez thinks that her “grilling” of witnesses and her daring assertion that there is no such thing as a proof to question President Biden are, in her thoughts, walk-off statements.
And who might blame her? The media will dutifully go to bat for her. And for Biden, for that matter.
Keep in mind the wall-to-wall protection of President Donald Trump’s impeachment proceedings? Gone.
The very fact-checkers who scrutinized each assertion in his protection? Now defending Biden each step of the way in which.
There isn’t any unbiased press holding authorities accountable on this nation any longer.
CNN’s “truth examine” of Kevin McCarthy’s impeachment-inquiry announcement aligns remarkably carefully with the White Home’s 14-page memo to media. | By @BecketAdams https://t.co/kTT1KhW6DG
— Nationwide Evaluation (@NRO) September 20, 2023
Help Conservative Voices!
Signal as much as obtain the most recent political information, perception, and commentary delivered on to your inbox.
However we don’t play that recreation right here at The Political Insider. Why? As a result of, in contrast to the legacy media, we’re not the enemy of reality or the enemy of the folks.
With that, there’s a plethora of proof supporting an inquiry to question Biden. And there may be some stable proof that he was a major beneficiary of Hunter Biden’s enterprise schemes, making him beholden to quite a few overseas entities.
In actual fact, the phrase “beneficiary” is a crucial one.
Simply days previous to Ocasio-Cortez claiming that there’s “zero proof” to question Biden, a report came out exhibiting the President’s house deal with in Delaware was listed as a “beneficiary” of wires totaling greater than $250,000 from Hunter Biden’s Chinese language enterprise companions in 2019.
Whereas Biden was operating for president, his son obtained $260,000 from China, with Joe’s Delaware house because the beneficiary deal with on the cash wires. Financial institution data don’t lie—in contrast to Joe Biden.
Tune into Congress’ first impeachment inquiry listening to now: https://t.co/q4JHR4GCn2 pic.twitter.com/BUQjkIcVBz
— Kevin McCarthy (@SpeakerMcCarthy) September 28, 2023
In actual fact, these funds got here simply months after Biden introduced his presidential marketing campaign. Nearly as in the event that they have been making an attempt to curry favor with the Biden model in some way in anticipation of his election. Huh.
Now, if you’re probably the most ardent schill for the President (like CNN’s fact-checker Paul Reubens Daniel Dale) you would possibly come again and say, “No, these are simply funds to Hunter and whereas we have been initially reticent to confess the President’s son is a greasy cash whore for different nations, we will settle for that truth now as a way to defend our muse within the White Home.”
You would possibly say that. Only one downside.
Hunter was not residing along with his mother and father in Delaware on the time of the funds, he was residing in California. We all know this due to Hunter’s rejected sweetheart plea deal.
White Home spox is straight up mendacity. Hunter wasn’t staying at his mother and father’ home, he was residing in California when the Chinese language enterprise associates despatched their funds with Joe Biden’s deal with on them, in line with Hunter’s failed responsible plea @DailyCaller https://t.co/wneWjoWx6z https://t.co/2OtBC701bW pic.twitter.com/cLymw9ELsq
— James Lynch (@jameslynch32) September 27, 2023
RELATED: Subpoenas Are Coming For The Biden Family – Including Possibly The President
The Beneficiary, The Model, And The Large Man
Except for being a “beneficiary” of funds from China, there may be loads of different proof to justify the hassle to question President Biden.
In keeping with reported pictures, customer logs, and different documentation, President Biden personally met with at least 14 of Hunter’s enterprise associates over 16 events between 2010 and 2018 – together with associates from China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Ukraine, and Mexico.
Why? As a part of an effort, in line with Hunter Biden enterprise affiliate Devon Archer, to promote their identify.
Archer testified that the President personally interjected almost two dozen occasions on telephone calls and in private conferences along with his son’s enterprise associates whereas serving as vp as a method to promote “the model.”
🚨 BREAKING: Hunter Biden’s former enterprise companion Devon Archer testified that VP Joe Biden was placed on speakerphone 20+ occasions to “promote the model” in enterprise discussions pic.twitter.com/uwtgXcJPfZ
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) July 31, 2023
An IRS whistleblower’s testimony earlier this 12 months revealed a WhatsApp message from Hunter threatening a overseas nationwide and claiming that his father was sitting within the room with him on the time as a method to strong-arm him.
“I’m sitting right here with my father and we want to perceive why the dedication made has not been fulfilled,” Hunter advised a Chinese language businessman earlier than issuing an express risk.
Their warnings fell on deaf ears.
In August 2020, a search warrant uncovered a textual content between Hunter and Henry Zhao, an govt at a Chinese language firm that paid Hunter $100,000.
The textual content talked about Joe Biden repeatedly.
Investigators weren’t allowed to confirm the data. pic.twitter.com/wpqmrkppz1
— Rep. Jason Smith (@RepJasonSmith) June 22, 2023
Archer additionally confirmed that the then-Vice President Biden met in 2014 with Russian billionaire Elena Baturina — the widow of the previous mayor of Moscow — at a Georgetown café.
Hunter, in line with a New York Post report final 12 months, obtained over $100 million in funding backing from Baturina.
Coincidentally, Baturina was left off Biden’s Russia sanctions final 12 months, which might seemingly be a clear-cut instance of the President being compromised to the detriment of nationwide safety!
Devon Archer simply testified that Joe Biden met with the Moscow mayor’s billionaire spouse Elena Baturina in spring 2014 earlier than she wired $3.5 million to Hunter Biden.
Baturina is similar Russian oligarch the Biden regime refused to sanction.
If you’re searching for how the Biden… pic.twitter.com/QNGZkIKsLK
— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) July 31, 2023
Democrats and the media need you to consider Biden by no means received a bit of that pie.
Biden has already admitted to utilizing his place to stress Ukraine to fireplace the nation’s prosecutor for wanting right into a gasoline firm linked along with his son, Hunter.
It’s all on tape.
JOE BIDEN: “I might not dictate who ought to be prosecuted or who ought to be exonerated.”
ALSO JOE BIDEN: “I checked out them and mentioned: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor isn’t fired, you’re not getting the cash. Nicely, son of a bitch. He received fired.”
What a scumbag. pic.twitter.com/GsQPCX5FyJ
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) November 21, 2019
That prosecutor, by the way in which, was Viktor Shokin, who very lately accused Hunter and President Biden himself of accepting bribes.
If you’re to consider Ocasio-Cortez, then you definitely additionally must ignore the shell financial institution accounts with at least $20 million from overseas sources to the Biden household.
Right here is all of the “no proof” within the Biden impeachment inquiry obtained by Home Oversight.
1. Hunter’s enterprise companions & associates met within the White Home over 80 occasions when Biden was VP pic.twitter.com/RtUgRtgfgl
— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) September 13, 2023
Hell, we will go all the way in which again to one of many preliminary items of proof from Hunter’s laptop computer that the media tried desperately to censor.
A 2017 e mail obtained by Fox News simply previous to the 2020 presidential election appeared to stipulate a payout for the President in a three way partnership with CEFC China Vitality.
It included a proposed fairness break up of “20” for “H” and “10 held by H for the massive man?”
Tony Bobulinski, a former enterprise affiliate of Hunter Biden, has insisted the “large man” is a reference to Joe Biden, although that has not been confirmed elsewhere.
Hunter Biden’s former enterprise companion Tony Bobulinski: “I 1000% sit right here and know that ‘the massive man’ is referencing Joe Biden”https://t.co/CDtS3zSI7P pic.twitter.com/HlttD5WOPw
— RNC Analysis (@RNCResearch) October 28, 2020
Biden’s the “model.” He’s the “beneficiary.” And he’s the “large man.”
However we’re presupposed to consider there may be “zero proof” to question?
The one factor briefly provide, the one factor that there’s “zero” of, is integrity amongst Ocasio-Cortez, her Democrat colleagues, and the media.
Now’s the time to help and share the sources you belief.
The Political Insider ranks #3 on Feedspot’s “100 Finest Political Blogs and Web sites.”