Rachel ‘Raquel‘ Leviss is FINISHED along with her “Vanderpump Guidelines” previous in additional methods than one!
Following Leviss’ revelation that she wouldn’t be returning to the hit Bravo sensation for its upcoming season and her revealing current three-part interview on Bethenny Frankel’s podcast, Leviss, 29, is taking one more step to separate herself from all issues “Vanderpump Guidelines.”
For these viewers who don’t establish as Bravo devotees, Leviss has obtained intense backlash because the reveal of her affair with ‘VPR’ co-star Tom Sandoval earlier this 12 months. Sandoval has had a long-term relationship with fellow VPR co-star Ariana Madix for practically ten years.
The world was in a position to nab a peek into the trio’s actuality over the following months courtesy of the series’ tenth-season reunion. The trio’s solid mates, Lisa Vanderpump herself, have been additionally extremely affected by the affair and would collect to blow off steam.
Months have handed because the reunion, and as Leviss hasn’t been shy about expressing currently, she’s achieved, particularly along with her ex. Learn on to find Leviss’ new plan to maintain Sandoval out of her life perpetually!
Madix Responded To Leviss’ Controversial Interview
Madix has had a difficult 12 months, and it looks like Frankel hasn’t made her therapeutic course of any simpler.
She didn’t preserve quiet about Leviss’ interview on Frenkel’s podcast, “Simply B With Bethenny Frankel.”
In line with our piece on Madix’s response, the “Vanderpump Guidelines” star was frank about her emotions towards Frankel. The “Actual Housewives of New York” alumna “upset” Madix “extra within the issues that have been mentioned” within the dialog after proclaiming Frankel ought to “know higher” than to have interviewed with Leviss.
Madix opened as much as her greatest good friend, Scheana Shay, on Shay’s podcast “Shenanigans With Scheana Shay,” detailing she felt Frankel’s proclamations about her childless relationship with Sandoval and the truth that the pair by no means married have been “hurtful and insensitive.”
Madix mentioned, “In lots of states, he was my [common-law spouse]. I discover that hurtful with regard to different ladies in relationships who don’t have kids. Perhaps they will’t have kids or don’t need to get married,” she added.
Madix additionally had some sturdy phrases for Frankel; she believes Frankel “didn’t know what the f**okay she was speaking about” in the course of the interview.
Leviss Takes One other Step To Shield Her Psychological Well being
Leviss closely mentioned the consequences of’ Sandoval’ on her psychological well being because the information broke in March.
She confided in Frankel about one in all her “worst fears.” The truth star was reportedly afraid of “alienating” her 40-year-old ex down the road.
Leviss additionally spent some well-documented time in a remedy middle for psychological well being. She would additionally reveal she believed she “deserved” the scathing feedback directed to her by her solid mates in the course of the reunion. Her advanced sense of self has been the important thing to her refusal to “settle for these phrases” and have them outline her character.
Leviss can be now not permitting Sandoval to to outline her life story particulars! On Tuesday, Leviss posted a screenshot of Sandoval’s Instagram profile to her account, displaying she had blocked him.
Leviss added a sticker saying, “Okay, bye!” to her screenshot.
According to Page Six, Sandoval had expressed his needs and emotions in an Instagram remark. The outlet reported Sandoval wrote, “Completely happy birthday, Rachel; I hope your discovering peace and happiness. Miss you, good friend.”
As of this writing, Sandoval has not responded to Leviss’ actions.
Leviss was candid in expressing her perception she “wanted” their relationship to turn out to be public in her interview with Frankel. (per The Blast) She would name the revelation “the largest wakeup name” and added she “wanted to get caught” to take the required steps to work on her psychological well being.
